USPTO serial 78614211
MASTERS SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERS SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | Musical instruments, namely, guitars, accordions, recorders, harmonicas, pianos, saxophones, flutes, and clarinets; electric musical instruments; electronic musical instruments; sheet music stands | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2009 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |