USPTO serial 78614713
VP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Road Town, Tortola, VG
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380)
James M. Slattery (Reg. No. 28,380) BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH AND BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio visual (AV) perception technology equipment, namely, a signal processing chip set and sub-pixels arrangement for television comprised of computer hardware and software for use in compressing, decompressing and enhancing AV sounds and images; electric display panels, LCD displays, Plasma displays, projection displays, LED displays, OLED displays; transmission devices, namely, apparatus for the transmission of sounds and images using proprietary encoding format; blank recordable storage devices, namely, DVD disk, high definition digital disks, hard disk, flash memory; audio visual players, namely, CD/DVD players, high definition digital disk players, portable media players, digital audio players; audio visual recorders, namely, cassette and tape recorders and digital audio visual recorders; audio visual compression, namely, AV integrated circuits, audio visual encoder and decoder for enhancing image quality by giving the human brain a visual perception of better image while re-arranging the subpixel of a display and applying a controlling algorithm | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Digital compression of audio and visual computer files whereas the file names end with ".vpx" and ".vpw" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |