USPTO serial 78614860
IPACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IPACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Y. Tu
JOHN Y. TU119 S ATLANTIC BLVD STE 305MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754-2776MONTEREY PARK, CA 91754Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 022 | For use on all purpose sports bags, back packs, briefcases, business cases, carry-on bags, duffel bags, handbags, and computer carrying cases | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |