Drawing for MING LEE SIMMONS

USPTO serial 78614880

MING LEE SIMMONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MING LEE SIMMONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jack McCue

Jack McCue McCue Sussmane & Zapfel, P.C.521 Fifth Avenue28th FloorNew York, NY 10175

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Musical sound recordings; audio-visual recordings, namely, compact discs, tape cassettes, audio cassettes, audio tapes, audio discs, records, CD-ROMs, video tapes, video cassettes, video discs, DVDs, DATs, MP3s and laser discs, all featuring music, educational and entertainment material; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of fiction and non-fiction books, booklets, comic books, short stories, novels, magazines, journals, manuals, brochures, leaflets, pamphlets and newsletters, all featuring educational and entertainment material; electronic publications, namely, fiction and non-fiction books, booklets, comic books, short stories, novels, magazines, journals, manuals, brochures, leaflets, pamphlets and newsletters, all featuring educational and entertainment material recorded on CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, MP3s, diskettes, floppy disks, video cassettes, and magnetic tapes; educational software and entertainment software principally comprising of computer game software and video game software; computer and video game cartridges; computer and video game cassettes; computer and video game discs; computer and video game tapes; computer and video programs for prerecorded games; interactive multimedia computer game program; interactive video game programs; interactive video games of virtual reality comprised of computer hardware and software; video game machines for use with televisions; video output game machines for use with televisions; video game interactive hand-held remote controls for playing games; video game interactive remote control units; video game interactive control floor pads or mats; computer game joysticks; magnets; decorative magnets; refrigerator magnets; novelty magnets; mouse pads; compact disc cases; fitted cases for storage and transportation, namely, cases for compact discs, audio cassettes, video cassettes, CD-ROMs, home video games, home video game accessories, computers, computer accessories, cameras, camcorders and portable phones; computer carrying cases; wrist rests and supports for computer mouse users; wrist rests for computer products; computer keyboard wrist pads; protective eyewear; sunglasses; eyeglasses; eyeglass frames; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle cases; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle straps; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle chains; eyeglass, sunglass and spectacle cleaning clothsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 10, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 6, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 6, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 10, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 10, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 10, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 10, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 10, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 4, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 5, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 1, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 25, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 27, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 27, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 3, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance