USPTO serial 78615002
MITTAL STEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MITTAL STEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.Suite #1100Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Iron, steel and ferrous alloys, direct reduced iron, directly reduced iron, tin plate, galvanized steel, color coated steel and aluminum coated steel products, namely, blocks, plates, pipes, tubes, sheets, strips, foils, rods, wires, coils, beams, slabs, blooms, billets, and sections; iron ore; blooms and metal building material for railroad tracks; metal building materials, namely, barbed wires, porches of metal for building, framework of metal for building, pillars of metal for building, flashing of metal for building, plaster siding of metal for building, wall linings of metal for building, reinforcing materials of metal for building, namely, steel plates and sheets, girders of metal, metal cladding for construction and building, brackets of metal for building, building panels of metal, cladding of metal for building, frames of metal for building, stringers parts of staircases of metal, stair treads steps of metal, chimney pots of metal, doors for strongbox, duckboards of metal, trellis of metal, hinges of metal, stair cases of metal, anchor bolts of metal for bridge connection, connectors of metal for structure joint, chimneys of metal, chimney cowls of metal, handrails of metal, bars for metal railings, outer doors of metal, door panels of metal, draw handles of metal, girders of metal, lathes of metal of metal, manholes of metal, manhole covers of metal, gales of metal, gate stops of metal, door knockers of metal, door stops of metal, door handles of metal, door frames of metal, gutters of metal, gutter pipes of metal, floors of metal, barricades of metal, scaffolding of metal, drainpipes of metal, wall boards of metal, branching pipes of metal, non-electric door closers of metal, non-electric door openers of metal, latch bars of metal, ice moulds of metal, lintels of metal, shutters of metal, water pipes of metal, penstock pipes of metal, strap hinges of metal, sheets and plates of metal, sheet piles of metal, under drainage pipes of metal, casement windows of metal, fencers of metal, sliding doors of metal, poles of metal for electric lines, joists of metal, foundry moulds of metal, roof coverings of metal, props of metal, wainscoting of metal, windows of metal, window stops of metal, window pulleys of metal, gratings of metal, window frame system units of metal, ceiling decorations of metal, namely, metal ceiling medallions, ceiling boards of metal, partition units of metal, comices of metal, sills of metal, ferrules of metal, floor hinges of metal, rotary window fasteners of metal, crash barriers of metal for roads, fish plates rails, runner of metal for sliding doors, turnstiles, non-automatic of metal, sashes of metal, greenhouse frames of metal, roof slashing of metal, metal rails for window, metal handles for windows, metal window frames, metal pulley for window frame; moldings of metal for cornices, shuttering of metal for concrete, metal reinforcing materials for concrete and pipes, namely, metal pipe clips, metal pipe collars, elbows of metal for pipes, and ferrules of metal for handles; non-electric cables; wires and ropes of iron, steel and ferrous alloy; nails; tempered steel; metallic moulds for metal casting; construction elements made of metal, namely, shores, supports, and braces; materials of metal for railway construction; metal brackets for use in the construction and assembly of decking; metal cladding for construction and building; metallic piping; packaging made of metal | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |