USPTO serial 78616223
SUN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph J. Ferretti
Jeanette S. Zimmer FRITO-LAY NORTH AMERICA, INC.7701 LEGACY DRIVEMAIL STOP 3A-421PLANO, TX 75024Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | POTATO-BASED SNACK FOODS, NAMELY, POTATO CHIPS AND POTATO CRISPS; VEGETABLE CRISPS; DIPS; PROCESSED NUTS; PROCESSED SEEDS; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF DRIED FRUIT AND NUTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PRETZELS; TORTILLA CHIPS, TORTILLA CRISPS AND CHEESE-FLAVORED PUFFED CORN SNACKS; POPPED POPCORN; SAUCES; SNACK MIX CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF NUTS, CLUSTERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF GRANOLA WITH DRIED FRUITS AND NUTS, AND MULTIGRAIN NUGGETS CONTAINING DRIED FRUITS AND NUTS, ALL OF THE AFOREMENTIONED EXCLUDING BREAKFAST CEREAL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SUN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 18, 2012 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 23, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |