USPTO serial 78616354
SBK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SBK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPPO BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583-0416UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | BICYCLES, MOTORCYCLES AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREFOR, MOTORBIKES, MOTORIZED SCOOTERS; MOTORCYCLES FOR MOTOCROSS, PARTS OF MOTORCYCLES, NAMELY, BRAKE CABLES, CLUTCH CABLES, FORK BEARINGS AND RACES, FORK DUST BOOTS, FORK SEALS, HANDLE BARS, HANDLE BAR CONTROL LEVERS, HANDLE BAR DAMPERS, HANDLE BAR GRIPS, BRAKE CALIPERS, BRAKE PEDALS, BRAK ROTORS, FRONT SPACERS, FRONT DASH PANELS, SHIFT LEVERS, AND HEADLIGHT MOUNTS; PNEUMATIC TYRES AND INNER TUBES FOR MOTORCYCLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 23, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |