USPTO serial 78617387
MIXTERMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIXTERMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan S. Nemes
Alan S. Nemes Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP720 Olive Street, Suite 2400St. Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronics accessories, namely, cases and pouches designed for carrying personal digital assistants, portable music players, portable video games, smartphones and mobile phones | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textile and textile goods, namely, afghans, bath linen, bath towels, beach towels, bed blankets, bed canopies, bed linen, bed pads, bed sheets, bed skirts, bed spreads, billiard cloth, chenille fabric, comforters, crib bumpers, crib canopies, curtain fabric, curtains, dish cloths, drapes, draperies, dust ruffles, duvets, duvet covers, eiderdowns, nyloy fabric, fabric for boots, slippers and shoes, fabric for manufacturing jerseys, flannel, household linen, kitchentowels, linen, linen lining fabric for slippers, mattress covers, mattress pads, net curtains, pillows vases, pillow shams, pot holders, quilts, shams, shower curtains, table linen, textile printers blankets, textile wall hangings, blanket throws, towels, unfitted fabric for furniture covers, upholstery fabrics, velvet , wash cloths and window curtains | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Apparel accessories, namely, bandanas, belts, earmuffs, gloves, mittens, muffs, scarves, suspenders, sweatbands and wristbands; beachwear, namely, bathing suits, bathing trunks and beach coverups; clothing, namely, aprons, blouses; clothing of imitation leather and leather, namely, gloves, mittens, earmuffs, suspenders, wristbands, dresses, coats, jackets, jeans, jumpers, jumpsuits, pants, shirts, shorts, skirts, suits, trousers, headwear and vests; masquerade costumes, dresses, gowns, jeans, jerseys, jumpers, jumpsuits, overalls, pants, pullovers; rainwear and waterproof clothing, namely, raincoats, rain boots, rain jackets and rain suits; shirts, shorts, short sets comprised of a bottom and top, skirts, smocks, stockings, suits, sweaters, sweatpants, sweatsuits, tanktops, t-shirts, trousers, uniforms and vests; footwear, namely, athletic footwear, bath sandals, bath slippers, beach shoes, boots, clogs, galoshes, sandals, shoes, slippers and slippersocks; headwear, namely, caps, hats, headbands, hoods and visors; infantwear; lingerie, loungewear and underwear, namely, bathrobes, bodices, bras, camisoles, chemisettes, corsets, dressing gowns, hosiery, pantyhose, slips and tights; neckwear; sleepwear; outerwear, namely, coats, jackets, parkas, ponchos, raincoats, shawls and stoles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MISS MATCHED, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Miss Match, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Miss Match, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MIXTERMAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 15, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |