USPTO serial 78617475
CRANKY DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRANKY DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Address books; diaries; appointment books; ball point pens; binders; bookmarks; books, periodicals, magazines and newspapers, all featuring stories, paper gift wrap bows; calendars; gift cards; greeting cards; cartoon strips, cartoon prints and newspaper cartoons; pen and pencil cases; children's activity books; paper tablecloths; coloring books; paper trays; paper party hats; paper napkins; pens; pencils; stationery; stickers, decals; posters; spiral notebooks and notebook paper; memo pads; erasers; pencil sharpeners, paper staplers; writing paper; envelopes; paperweights; paper coasters; paper mats; ungraduated rulers; photographs; postcards; trading cards; heat transfer paper; drawing pads; and color pencils | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2006 |
| 018 | Athletic bags; baby backpacks; backpacks; all purpose athletic bags; beach bags; book bags; diaper bags; duffel bags; gym bags; tote bags; coin purses; fanny packs; knapsacks; waist packs; leather, mesh and textile shopping bags; umbrellas; wallets; luggage; handbags and purses; briefcases; and cosmetic bags sold empty | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2006 |
| 035 | Retail store services, online retail store services and mail order catalog services, all featuring clothing and general consumer goods, cosmetics, tins, magnets, mouse pads, automobile accessories, clocks, pins, watches, jewelry, address books, bumper stickers, calendars, diary books, envelops, folders, greeting cards, notebooks, postcards, posters, stationery, backpacks, tote bags, wallets, key chains, lunch boxes, baseball caps, hats, boxer briefs, boxer shorts, briefs, pajamas, underwear, sandals, shirts, shoes, slippers, sneakers, socks, t-shirts, tank tops, toys, baby clothing, souvenirs, dishes, mugs, packaged food and drinks, sporting items, picture frames, pillows and figurines | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cranky Design
- Other trademarks owned by Cranky Design
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named CRANKY DESIGN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |