USPTO serial 78618341
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SILVER SPRING, MD
Silver Spring, MD
Silver Spring, MD
Silver Spring, MD
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
ANDREW N. SPIVAK MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP2000 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 5500WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software for data exchange between computer systems, software for integration of computer systems, software for data reporting, software for binding and mapping data from different sources, software to generate documents, software for post-processing documents and related taxonomies into multiple human readable foments and machine processable formats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 28, 2005 |
| 041 | Computer training services, namely, training in the use of software; computer training services in the field of XBRL in general and on the use of software solutions | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2007 |
| 042 | Computer software consulting; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; computer consulting services relating to the analysis of a customer's procedures to determine where XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language) can be used; design and implementation of specific XBRL computer software solutions for others to maximize effectiveness and reusability of data; Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others that run XBRL processes, of XBRL-enabled applications that gather data through a worldwide global computer network from different sources, of XBRL-enabled applications that gather data through a worldwide global computer network from insurance claims for others, and of XBRL-enabled application that gather data through a worldwide global computer network from loan applications for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 21, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 17, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |