USPTO serial 78618567
EZ WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EZ WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, PULLOVERS, CARDIGANS, SWEATERS, TROUSERS, SKIRTS, JACKETS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, JEANS, SWEATPANTS, SHORTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SUITS, DRESSES, OVERCOATS, COATS, RAINCOATS, BELTS, JERSEYS, NECKWEAR, SOCKS AND STOCKINGS, TIGHTS, VESTS, WAISTCOATS, JUMPERS, TRACKSUITS, BLOUSONS, GYMSUITS, KNICKERS, T-SHIRTS, ANORAKS, SUSPENDERS, LOUNGEWEAR, UNDERWEAR, BEACHWEAR, SLEEPWEAR, HEADWEAR, OVERALLS, HATS AND CAPS, GLOVES, SHOES, SANDALS, BOOTS AND SLIPPERS | ABANDONED | Mar 10, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |