USPTO serial 78618594
BEEHIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3147910Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 26, 2006
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEEHIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Julie Clark Communications, Inc.
Lake Bluff, IL
Julie Clark Communications, Inc.
Lake Bluff, IL
Julie Clark Communications, Inc.
Lake Bluff, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Margaret M. Serrano, Esq.
JULIE CLARK COMMUNICATIONS INCPO BOX 545LAKE BLUFF, IL 60044UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | pearls, cultured pearls, pearl jewelry, jewelry, baby jewelry, children's jewelry, body jewelry, necklaces, bracelets, earrings, ear clips, rings, brooches, pins, lapel pins, pendants, watches, clocks, charms, tiaras, medallions, medals, and cuff links | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Apr 20, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Julie Clark Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Julie Clark Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Julie Clark Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named BEEHIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |