Drawing for PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES

USPTO serial 78618604

PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELL, MARLENE D
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher D. Keirs

CHRISTOPHER D KEIRS WONG CABELLO LUTSCH RUTHERFORD ET AL20333 STATE HWY 249 STE 600HOUSTON, TX 77070-2614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Oil and gas well drilling services, namely, directional drilling services, controlled pressure drilling services, measurement-while-drilling services, and rotary steerable drilling system service; oil and gas well clean-up services.ACTIVE—
038Electronic transmission of message and dataACTIVE—
040Oil and gas well treatment services, namely, perforating services; oil and gas production stream separation services; oil production servicesACTIVE—
042Oil well testing, namely logging-while-drilling services, open hole logging, thru-casing logging, geosciences oil and gas well assessment services, oil and gas well log analysis services, and oil and gas well planning services; consulting services in the field of geoscience; analysis services for oil field exploration; wirelining for oil and gas wells; thru-pipe, well shuttle and slickline conveyed well logging by memory services, namely, measurement evaluations in the field of well loggingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 26, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance