USPTO serial 78618762
BOND-OST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HABEEB, MYRIAH A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOND-OST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Petersen
SCOTT W PETERSEN HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP131 S DEARBORN ST FL 30CHICAGO, IL 60603-5517UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | cheese | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 29, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |