USPTO serial 78619304
Serial No. 78619304
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78619304?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Pieter van Es
J PIETER VAN ES BANNER & WITCOFF LTD10 S WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-7437UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (The following goods are based on Sections 1a and 44e)Cinematographic apparatus and instruments; computers and computer peripheral devices; interfaces for computers; color control and color correction systems; film restoration apparatus and instruments; color processors; image processing apparatus and instruments; telecines; telecine color timing systems; telecine edit controllers; telecine computer grading systems; telecine remote control systems; telecine suite control systems; primary and secondary color correctors; video colorisers; video tape editing systems; film editing systems; film color timers; offline editors; non-linear editing systems; digital image storers; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; audio and video digital disk recorders; stores for stills; digital video effects systems; keycode (edgecode) data management computers; vision mixers; video noise reducers; film grain reducers; video graticule generators; video standards convertors; film compositing systems; video printing systems; image compression systems; computer software and computer programs; computer software and computer programs for use in film and video restoration and color correction; parts and fittings for all of the aforesaid goods (The following goods are based on Section1b) Telecines; offline editors; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; audio and video digital disk recorders; stores for stills; vision mixers; video noise reducers; film grain reducers; video graticule generators; video standards convertors; video printing systems; image compression systems; parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |