Drawing for MONSTER SEATS

USPTO serial 78619645

MONSTER SEATS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MONSTER SEATS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary L. Kevlin, Esq.

MARY L. KEVLIN, ESQ. COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electrical and scientific apparatus, namely, radios, radios incorporating clocks; pre-recorded videotapes relating to baseball, pre-recorded videodiscs relating to baseball; pre-recorded audio discs relating to baseball; compact disc cases; eyeglass cases, cases for personal digital assistants, cell phones, cell phone accessories, namely, cases and face plate covers; credit cards with magnetic coding; binoculars; signal whistles; video monitors; calculators; photographic cameras, camera cases, camera straps; megaphones, microphones; electric switch plate covers; electric signs, luminous signs, neon signs; sunglasses; decorative magnets; life preservers; baseball batting helmets, catcher's helmets; video and computer game cartridges, video and computer game discs, video and computer game cassettes, computer accessories, namely, mouse pads and wrist supports; computer software, namely, screen savers; computer monitor frames, computer carrying cases, computer game programs, and computer game programs downloadable from a global computer network in the field of baseballABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 30, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 30, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 8, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 21, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance