CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MONSTER SEATS

USPTO serial 78619654

MONSTER SEATS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONSTER SEATS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary L. Kevlin

MARY L. KEVLIN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, tables, benches, stools, chairs, headboards, booster seats, furniture chests, mirrors, window blinds, cabinets, chair pads, hampers, containers, cushions, pillows, sleeping bags, drinking straws, plastic license plates, plastic pet id tags, non-metal bottle caps, plastic key chain tags, non-metal key chains, non-metal key fobs, non-metal key rings, non-metal key holders, non-metal key clips, non-metal novelty pins, novelty buttons, plaques, mobiles, picture frames, non-metal boxes other than those of paper, non-metal mailboxes, storage racks for organizing clothes and sports equipment, non-metal lockers, display racks and point of purchase displays, all relating to or promoting the GREEN MONSTER entertainment, facility and mascot servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 29, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 29, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 23, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 4, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 4, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 27, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 29, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 16, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 5, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 12, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 12, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 12, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance