USPTO serial 78619682
WAVE LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- LEWIS, MICHAEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WAVE LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GLEN ALLEN, VA
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
Glen Allen, VA
Other trademarks owned by Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
Glen Allen, VA
Other trademarks owned by Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
Glen Allen, VA
Other trademarks owned by Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher E. Gatewood
Christopher E. Gatewood Threshold Counsel, PC1905 Huguenot Road, Suite 200Richmond, VA 23235UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric kitchen appliances, namely, electric food and beverage blenders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 27, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HAMILTON BEACH BRANDS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton Beach/Proctor-Silex, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named WAVE LOGIC
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 8, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |