Drawing for L'BEL PERFORMANCE

USPTO serial 78619781

L'BEL PERFORMANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
REGAN, JOHN B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with L'BEL PERFORMANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

Cristina A. Carvalho ARENT FOX LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Personal hygiene and personal care products, namely, anti-wrinkle creams, anti-aging creams, facial masks, facial cleansers, toners, eye creams, after-shave lotions, body cleansing lotions and creams, face creams and gels, personal deodorants, body powders, bath gelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 27, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Aug 27, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Aug 27, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 4, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 4, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 4, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Sep 4, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 5, 2007DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Apr 4, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 5, 2007DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Mar 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 13, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 24, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 3, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 23, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 6, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance