USPTO serial 78620186
MEDIRESOURCE, TARGETED HEALTH SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGLETON, RUDY
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEDIRESOURCE, TARGETED HEALTH SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glen Perinot
TORONTO ONC - ONTARIO M4V 3A1GLEN PERINOT; HEYDARY HAMILTON LLPSTE 803; 30 ST CLAIR AVE W,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Services concerned with the gathering, classification, storage, retrieval, presentation, marketing, consulting and selling of healthcare, medical and pharmaceutical information including associated support services directed to the consumer and healthcare and pharmaceutical industries | ACTIVE | Nov 27, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |