Drawing for MI PUEBLITO

USPTO serial 78620273

MI PUEBLITO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MI PUEBLITO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL K HENDERSHOT

MICHAEL K HENDERSHOT BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610-0395UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Cheese, chorizo and sour creamACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
May 3, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
May 2, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Mar 26, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 26, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 16, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Feb 16, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 16, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 22, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance