USPTO serial 78621425
VERITCAL FIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VERITCAL FIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey Dweck, Esq.
JEFFREY DWECK ESQ THE LAW FIRM OF JEFFREY S DWECK PC100 W 33RD ST STE 1013NEW YORK, NY 10001-2914UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Armoires, Bathroom Vanities, Bedroom Furniture, Benches, Book Stands, Bookcases Not Of Metal, Furniture Cabinets, Cabinetwork, Cast Stone Household and Garden Furniture, Chairs, Chaise Lounges, Chests Of Drawers, Clothing Trees, Coat Racks, Computer Furniture, Credenzas, Cupboards, Deck Chairs, , Decorative Non-Metal Closet Hooks, Desks, Dining Room Tables, Display Racks, Doors For Furniture, Furniture Entertainment Centers, Filing Cabinets, Foot Rests, Foot Stools, Furniture, Furniture Chests, Furniture Frames, Garment Racks, Hampers, Hat Racks, Hand-Held Mirrors, Hutches, Interior Window Shutters, Jewelry Boxes, Kitchen Cabinets, Lawn Furniture, Living Room Furniture, Locker Mirrors, Lockers, Love Seats, Magazine Racks, Mattress, Medicine Cabinets, Metal Display Stands, Mirrors, Nightstands, Non-Metal Bins, Non-Metal Boxes, Non-Metal Chests, Non-Metal Hooks, Office Furniture, Ottomans, Outdoor Furniture, Pedestals, Picture Frames, Furniture Seats, Shelves, Shelving Step Stools, Stools, , Storage Bins, Storage Cubes, Storage Racks, Tables, Tea Carts, Furniture Tool Chests, Furniture Toy Boxes, Toy Chests, Trestle, Wardrobes | ACTIVE | May 1, 2005 |
| 021 | Household Or Kitchen Utensils And Containers (Not Of Precious Metal Or Coated Therewith); Combs Decorative Bathroom Fixtures And Accessories, Namely, Toilet Paper Holders, Toothbrush Holders, Soap Dishes, Towel Racks, Towel Bars, Towel Rings And Towel Holders, Wastebaskets; Garbage Cans, Cups, Soap Dishes, Soap Holders, Drinking Vessels, Flower Pots, Non-Electric Teapots Not Of Precious Metal, Colanders For Household Use, Containers For Household Use; Cookware, Namely, All Purpose Portable Household; Dispensers For Liquid Soap,Dispensers For Paper Towels, Garbage Cans, Plastic Bath Racks, Plastic Buckets, ,Shower Caddies, Toilet Brushes, Toilet Brush Holders, Toilet Paper Dispensers, Toilet Paper Holders,Toilet Tissue Holders, Toothbrush Holders, Toothpick Holders, Toothpicks, Trash Cans,Trash Bath Accessories, Namely, Towel Bars, Towel Rings, Toothbrush Holders, Toilet Tissue Holders, Soap Dishes And Cup Holders | ACTIVE | May 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |