Drawing for KMC BUZZ

USPTO serial 78622076

KMC BUZZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3182731Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 12, 2006
Examiner
HIRSCHMAN, PAMELA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with KMC BUZZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Reichenthal

Mark I. Reichenthal Branfman Law Group, P.C.708 Civic Center DriveOceanside`, CA 92054UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035online retail information and retail news in the field of product offerings, namely, wheels, wheel accessories, toys and apparelSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 29, 2004
039online information and news in the field of automotive trendsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 29, 2004
045online information and news in the fields of fashion and cultureSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 29, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 25, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 18, 2018ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 14, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Dec 12, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 12, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 10, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 21, 2012EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 21, 2012PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Sep 21, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 31, 2012815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 31, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2012ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Aug 10, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 28, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 23, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 25, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 11, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 2, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 20, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 23, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 18, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 12, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 27, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 21, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 20, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 20, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance