USPTO serial 78622540
LETTÜS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAN, AMY C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LETTÜS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Emerald Hills, CA
Emerald Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Doyle B. Johnson
DOYLE B. JOHNSON REED SMITH LLP2 EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 2000P.O. BOX 7936SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3922Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail grocery stores | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2008 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 29, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |