Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78622749?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78622749. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns BOSTON MAGAZINE'S TABLE TALK?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78622749, the listed owner(s) include: Metro Corp., Metro Corp..

What is USPTO serial number 78622749?

Serial number 78622749 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark BOSTON MAGAZINE'S TABLE TALK. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of BOSTON MAGAZINE'S TABLE TALK?

BOSTON MAGAZINE'S TABLE TALK (78622749) currently shows USPTO status code 606 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover BOSTON MAGAZINE'S TABLE TALK?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78622749

BOSTON MAGAZINE'S TABLE TALK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606

Filing date: May 4, 2005
Status date: Mar 16, 2009
Registration date: —
Examiner: MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office: INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOSTON MAGAZINE'S TABLE TALK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Metro Corp.
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by Metro Corp.
Metro Corp.
Philadelphia, PA
Other trademarks owned by Metro Corp.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Bertsche

ROBERT BERTSCHE PRINCE LOBEL TYE LLP1 INTERNATIONAL PLACE, #3700BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Providing newsletters in the field of restaurant and food news and events via email and the internet	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 19, 2018	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Mar 16, 2009	MAB6	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2009	ABN6	ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED	The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2008	NOAM	NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT	A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2008	PUBO	PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION	Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2008	NPUB	NOTICE OF PUBLICATION	—
Apr 15, 2008	PREV	LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED	—
Apr 15, 2008	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Apr 8, 2008	CNSA	APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER	—
Apr 8, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Apr 8, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Oct 15, 2007	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Oct 15, 2007	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Oct 15, 2007	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Oct 15, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 20, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 20, 2007	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Sep 20, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Sep 20, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Sep 20, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Mar 20, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 20, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 24, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Feb 22, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Feb 22, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 25, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 9, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 9, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
May 3, 2006	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Dec 10, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 12, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—