CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for QUE TV

USPTO serial 78624048

QUE TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUE TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence J. Crain

Lawrence J. Crain GREER, BURNS & CRAIN, LTD.300 S WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60606-6771UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment programs, namely on-going television programs in the field of news, comedy, variety, sports, and education broadcast over television, cellular telephones, and the Internet; Entertainment services, namely providing on-going television programming in the field of news, comedy, variety, sports and education via the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 19, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 13, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 18, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 6, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 10, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 6, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance