USPTO serial 78624080
INTERNATIONAL CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE FOR AESTHETIC SURGERY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3363995Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 1, 2008
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTERNATIONAL CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE FOR AESTHETIC SURGERY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chattanooga, TN
Chattanooga, TN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Heartfield
JAMES C HEARTFIELD2288 GUNBARREL RD STE 111-249CHATTANOOGA, TN 37421UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Medical services, namely, cosmetic, plastic and reconstructive surgery | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 1, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 9, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |