USPTO serial 78624434
INTEGREO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIAMS, IRENE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGREO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John R. Harris
JOHN R HARRIS MORRIS MANNING & MARTIN LLP3343 PEACHTREE RD NE STE 1600ATLANTA FINANCIAL CENTERATLANTA, GA 30326-1044Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING (BPO) SERVICES FOR CLIENTS IN THE HEALTHCARE, INSURANCE, OTHER COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIES, AND GOVERNMENT, NAMELY, HEALTHCARE ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, CLAIMS REPRICING SERVICES, CLAIMS PROCESSING SERVICES, CLAIMS ADJUDICATION SERVICES, CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SERVICES, AND TECHNICAL HELP DESK SERVICES, VIA A GLOBAL SOURCING MODEL | ACTIVE | May 31, 2005 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL, TRAINING, AND CERTIFICATION SERVICES FOR TECHNICAL PROFESSIONALS | ACTIVE | May 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |