Drawing for BICE

USPTO serial 78624890

BICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRATER, JILL I
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth A. Corradino, Esq.

ELIZABETH A CORRADINO ESQ MOSES & SINGER LLP405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-1299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Stainless steel serving forks and serving spoons; dinnerware and related items composed of stoneware, porcelain, bone china or glass, namely, dishes, plates, bowls, serving platters, serving trays and meal trays not composed of precious metal; cups; saucers; mugs; condiment dispensers for household use; sugar bowls and cream pitcher sets; salt and pepper shaker sets; covered butter dishes; baking dishes; covered vegetable bowls; gravy boats; non-electric coffee servers not composed of precious metal; candle stick holders not composed of precious metal; crocks; cookie jars; coasters; casserole dishes; decanters; trivets; canisters; napkin holders; baskets; chip and dip bowl sets; candy dishes; glass beverageware; plastic cutting boards; carafes; teapots and colanders for household use not composed of precious metal; acrylic food storage jars for household use; containers for household and kitchen use; household and kitchen utensils, namely, garlic presses, egg separators, tart cutters, cake testers, graters, onion holders, food and pastry brushes, pot and pan scrapers, food scrapers, spatulas, scoops; spoons, namely, mixing, serving and slotted spoons; food mashers; kitchen ladles; whisks; whips for whipping food; turners; dough rolling pins; cookie droppers; pastry boards; jar openers; boil control disks placed at the bottom of pots to prevent spillovers; corn cob holders; corn butterers; food shakers; pitchers; cookware, namely, pots, pans, pot lids and covers; bakeware, namely, food molds, bread molds, cookie molds; baking racks; cooling racks; spring form pans; muffin pans; baking sheets; pie pans; pie plates; cake pans; loaf pans; trivets; food strainers; stoneware, namely, bowls, pie plates, pans, cake pans and roasters; baking stones; baking pans; roasters; corkscrews; non-electric pastry blenders; non-electric juicers; pastry cuttersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 12, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2005GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Dec 14, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Dec 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance