USPTO serial 78625009
HOOKLESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 13, 2009
- Examiner
- RINGLE, JAMES W
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HOOKLESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Nr. Filham, Ivybridge, Devon, GB
Ivybridge, Devon, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheryl L. De Luca
SHERYL L. DE LUCA NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N. GLEBE ROAD, 11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, JACKETS, FLYING JACKETS, REPRODUCTION FLYING JACKETS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 14, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 8, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |