CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DART

USPTO serial 78625200

DART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3176231Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 28, 2006
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas A. Boshinski

THOMAS A BOSHINSKI MEADWESTVACO CORPORATIONCOURTHOUSE PLZ NEDAYTON, OH 45463-0001UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009software for monitoring packaging machinery performanceSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDOct 11, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2007C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 12, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 6, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 19, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance