USPTO serial 78625965
MOMMY MILLIONAIRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MOMMY MILLIONAIRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Grand Haven, MI
Grand Haven, MI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
TERRY CALAGHAN
TERRY CALAGHAN PRICE HENEVELD COOPER DEWITT LLP695 KENMOOR SEP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Non-fiction books in the field of business | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |