USPTO serial 78626230
ALLEGHENY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3266673Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ALLEGHENY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan J. Prepelka, Registration No. 43,016
Nathan J. Prepelka, Registration No. 43,016 The Webb Law Firm436 Seventh Avenue700 Koppers BuildingPittsburgh, PA 15219Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal hose fittings, metal pipe fittings, metal pipe couplings, metal flanges, and various other metal parts, namely bends, gaskets, tees, laterals, y's, saddles, crosses, nipples, strainers and reducers for above ground tank transportation industry | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1955 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 16, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |