USPTO serial 78626645
THINK SERVICE, DELIVER EXCELLENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THINK SERVICE, DELIVER EXCELLENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Princeton, NJ
Princeton, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn A. Gundersen
GLENN A GUNDERSEN CIRA CTRDECHERT LLP2929 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Economic forecasting and analysis for the health industry; business management and consulting services for the health industry in the field of marketing, research, and development; market research, namely, collecting market trends data from providers and patients, data on health economic issues, and competitive intelligence data on the marketplace for pharmaceutical products and medical devices; administering customer service programs, namely, operating patient assistance programs for pharmaceutical products and medical devices, and providing access to advocacy groups and counseling for patients to promote patient satisfaction | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Testing and development of pharmaceuticals, biotechnology products, and medical devices; organizing and managing clinical trials for pharmaceuticals, biotechnology products, and medical devices for others; clinical research services, namely, collection, calibration, analysis, and reporting of data in connection with clinical trials of pharmaceutical, biotechnology products, and medical devices; consulting and support services in the field of clinical trials of pharmaceuticals, namely, forecasting drug supply requirements for clinical trials, monitoring drug supplies in clinical trials, and analyzing and reporting data related to the foregoing; computer services, namely, providing a database for tracking, monitoring, and generating reports on information and statistics about patient reimbursement and insurance coverage for pharmaceuticals and medical devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COVANCE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by COVANCE INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THINK SERVICE, DELIVER EXCELLENCE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |