USPTO serial 78627702
PATTERSON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATTERSON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mendota Heights, MN
Mendota Heights, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrea M. Bond
ANDREA M BOND BRIGGS & MORGAN PA80 S 8TH ST STE 2200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2157UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Mail order catalog, on-line catalog and distributorship services, excluding retail pharmacy services, featuring equipment and supplies in the field of veterinary services; providing an on-line consumer database in the field of animal health products | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Planning and layout design services for veterinary clinics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Patterson Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Patterson Companies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PATTERSON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2008 | PGDV | PETITION GRANTED - REQUEST TO DIVIDE FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 18, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |