USPTO serial 78628229
SPRING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3195141Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 2, 2007
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SPRING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail stores featuring safe, less toxic and environmentally sound household products, namely, the following products-- [air filters for domestic use, air purifiers,] air purifiers for household purposes, all-purpose cleaners,[ vacuum cleaners, vacuum cleaner bags], vacuum cleaners for household purposes, [multi-purpose steam cleaners, steam cleaning machines,] water filters, [electric light bulbs, non-medicated toiletries, bath lotion, bath oil, bath salts,] bath products, shampoos, shampoos for babies, face and body lotions, facial cleansers, laundry detergent, [wood preserving oils,] sun-block lotions,[ disposable wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds, pet odor removers, non-medicated and non-veterinary grooming preparation, namely, pet shampoo, pet stain removers,] candles, bed linen, [bed sheets, beds, diagnostic devices for measuring and monitoring household indoor air quality and environmental condition of homes for use in household inspections, paint primers, paint sealers, paints,] low-voc paints, non-toxic paints, non-voc paints, [paints for household use, cleaning preparations for household purposes, baby food, baby crib,] baby lotion, baby products for nursery, baby powder, baby wipe, bath linen | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 19, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |