USPTO serial 78628617
M.O.B.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M.O.B.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A MUSICAL GROUP; ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF VISUAL AND AUDIO PERFORMANCES BY A MUSICAL GROUP; ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, LIVE MUSIC CONCERTS; ENTERTAINMENT NAMELY, PERSONAL APPREARANCES BY A MUSICAL GROUP; RECORD PRODUCTION; RECORD MASTER PRODUCTION; MUSIC PRODUCTION; AUDIO RECORDING AND PRODUCTION; VIDEOTAPE PRODUCTION; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PRODUCING AND DISTRIBUTING MUSICAL AUDIO AND VIDEO RECORDINGS; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A WEB SITE FEATURING MUSICAL PERFORMANCES, MUSICAL VIDEOS, RELATED FILM CLIPS, PHOTOGRAPHS, AND OTHER MULTIMEDIA MATERIALS; ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING PRERECORDED MUSIC | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 11, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 15, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 15, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |