USPTO serial 78629016
SHEIKI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHEIKI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher R. Grobl, Esq.
CHRISTOPHER R GROBL ESQ SILVER STATE LEGAL4625 W NEVSO DR STE 2&3LAS VEGAS, NV 89103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing and accessories, namely, gloves, leg warmers, mittens, sashes, scarves, shawls, sweatbands, suspenders, and wristbands; bathrobes; body suits; dresses and skirts; evening gowns; footwear, namelyathletic shoes, boots, flats, high heels, sandals, shoes, and sneakers; headwear, namely bandannas, caps, hats, headbands and visors; hosiery, namely athletic socks, leggings, knee highs, pantyhose, socks, stockings, sweat socks and tights; jackets and coats, namely blazers, fur, leather, overcoats, parkas, pullovers,raincoats, ski jackets, sport coats, suit jackets and coats, top coats, and wind resistant jackets; pants, namely camouflage and military style pants, cargo pants, corduroys, dress pants, jeans, jogging pants, khakis, leather pants, running pants, pantsuits, slacks, and sweatpants; shirts, namely bikini tops, blouses, dress shirts,golf shirts, halter tops, jerseys, knit shirts, long-sleeved shirts, polo shirts, short-sleeved shirts, sweatshirts, t-shirts, and tank tops; shorts; namely basketball shorts, biker shorts, denim shorts, khaki shorts, knit shorts, running shorts, and sweat shorts; sleepwear, namely nightgowns, nightshirts, and pajamas; suits, namely jogging suits, pantsuits, running suits, single/double breasted suits, three-piece suits, and tuxedos; sweaters, namely cardigan, knit, v-neck and wool; swimwear, namely bathing suits, bathing trunks, and bikinis; ties, namely bowties and neckties; undergarments and lingerie, namely bikinis, boxer shorts, bras, briefs, camisoles, negligees, panties, teddies, thongs, underpants, and undershirts | ACTIVE | Aug 24, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 17, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |