USPTO serial 78629260
SAFETYSTREAM MOBILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SAFETYSTREAM MOBILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sarah B. Eitelbach
Sarah B. Eitelbach SARAH B. EITELBACH, P.S.2830 CASCADIA AVE SSEATTLE, WA 98144-6210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic, optical, opto-electronic and quantum goods, namely electric locks, electronic locks, optical locks, opto-electronic locks, locks operated with quantum cryptography called quantum locks, and lock-management systems comprised of the locks, keys and software to manage the utilization of both lock and key; communication devices, namely wide area radio frequency transmitters and receivers and local area radio frequency transmitters and receivers; communications software for connecting computer network users; control systems, namely computer software for use in electronic, optical, opto-electronic and quantum lock management that may be downloaded from a global computer network; personal secure-access control devices, namely cell phones, personal digital assistants, and electronic, optical, opto-electronic and quantum keys; security access and control devices, namely electronic, optical, opto-electronic and quantum keys, electronic, optical, opto-electronic and quantum transponders, electronic, optical, opto-electronic and quantum locks, and the containers to which such locks are affixed; computer hardware, firmware and software for use in relation to electronic, optical, opto-electronic and quantum lock management, namely controlling access to items of value that may be physical such as objects and spaces, through to controlling access to items of value that are not physical such as electronic or financial transactions; parts, fittings, and accessories for the aforementioned goods, namely physical locks such as door locks, locks for secure boxes, containers, and safes or virtual locks which are locks controlled by software for ensuring the security of financial and electronic transactions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 9, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |