USPTO serial 78629268
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sindian City, Taipei County, XP
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kao H. Lu
XPX - NOT PROVIDED CHUN-MING SHIH; HDLS PATENT & TRADEMARK4331 STEVENS BATTLE LNFAIRFAX VA, VA 22033UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Linear motors, Alternating current servo motors, Direct current motors, Electric motors for machines, Electric starter motors, Elevator motors, Starter motors, Starters for motors and engines, Linear actuators, electric generators, Power jacks, and Gear boxes other than for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Satellite antennas, Satellite dishes, Satellite processors, Satellite receivers, Satellit positioner, Dish antennas, Linear actuators for driving satellite reception dishes, electrical controllers, Automatic controllers for revolving doors, Sliding gate operators, Electric door openers, Electric gate operators, Electric switches, Electronic servo motor controllers, Converters, and Coaxial cables | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |