Drawing for F FRAN-SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE, INC.

USPTO serial 78629304

F FRAN-SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with F FRAN-SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Scott Creasman

W SCOTT CREASMAN POWELL GOLDSTEIN LLP1201 W PEACHTREE ST NW FL 14ATLANTA, GA 30309-3488UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Consulting services for franchisees and franchisors in the field of business organization and managementACTIVEOct 31, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 31, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 31, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 30, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 15, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance