USPTO serial 78630066
ZUCCA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZUCCA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART NICHOLSON GRAHAM599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Cotton fabrics, hemp yarn fabrics, silk fabrics, wool yarn fabrics, chemical fiber fabrics, inorganic fiber fabrics, mixed fiber fabrics, mixed yarn fabrics, narrow woven fabrics, paper yarn fabrics, covered rubber yarn fabrics; towels, Japanese coffon towels, handkerchiefs, Japanese general wrapping cloth; linen futon and quilts cases, pillowcases, bed sheets, blankets table napkins of textile, dish cloths; seat covers of textile, wall hangings of textile, curtains, tablecloths not of paper, draperies | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Non-Japanese style outerwear, children's wear and work clothing, namely, evening dresses, school uniforms, jackets, jogging pants, sweat pants, suits, skirts, ski jackets, ski pants, trousers, smocks, coats, overcoats, topcoats, mantles, raincoats; formal wear, namely, tuxedos; sweaters, shirts, nightwear, underwear, bathing suits, swimming caps; aprons, collar protectors, socks and stockings, puttees and gaiters, fur stoles, shawls, scarves, Japanese style socks (tabi), gloves and mittens, babies' style socks (tabi), gloves and mittens, babies' diapers of textile, neckties, neckerchiefs, bandanas, warmth-keeping supports, namely, leg warmers, mufflers, ear muffs; hoods, sedge hats, nightcap, clothing helmets and headgear for clothing, namely, hats and caps; garters, sock suspenders, suspenders, waistbands, belts for clothing; shoes, boots, slippers, sneakers; masquerade costumes; clothes for sports, namely, anoraks, karate suits, sports over uniforms, kendo outfits, judo suits, ski suits for competition, clothing headbands, wind jackets, uniforms and stockings, wristbands; boots for sports, namely, golf shoes, soccer shoes, ski boots, gymnastic shoes, tennis shoes, climbing boots, basketball sneakers, volleyball shoes, handball shoes, bowling shoes, boxing shoes, hockey shoes, baseball shoes, rugby shoes, footwear for track and field athletics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KABUSHIKI KAISHA ZUCCa DESIGN OFFICE (also trading as Zucca Design Office Inc.)
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named ZUCCA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |