Drawing for WOMEN'S INTUITION

USPTO serial 78630440

WOMEN'S INTUITION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ERVIN, INGA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WOMEN'S INTUITION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anne B. Nielsen

Anne B. Nielsen Universal City Studios LLLP100 Universal City Plaza Bldg 1280/6Uinversal City, CA 91608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041entertainment in the nature of on-going audio visual and multimedia interactive programming, namely, providing information on a web site in a wide variety of fields of interest to women; educational services, namely, conducting on-line interactive conferences, seminars and courses via the Internet in the fields of health, pregnancy, child birth, beauty, diet and fitness, food, parenting, pets, relationships, travel and careersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 26, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 26, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 14, 2010EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 24, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2009EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2009EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 25, 2009AMPBAMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2008ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 21, 2008EPPATEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
May 28, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 31, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 25, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 12, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 12, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance