USPTO serial 78631152
SWING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3518174Status 780Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2008
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with SWING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Urban City Talent Designs Inc.
San Bernardino, CA
Urban City Talent Designs Inc.
San Bernardino, CA
Urban City Talent Designs Inc.
San Bernardino, CA
ATLANTA, GA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Game and sporting equipment, namely, golf balls, golf clubs, golf grips, golf gloves, golf club heads, golf club shaft, golf club head covers, golf tees, golf ball markers; softballs, baseballs, softball bats, baseball bats, softball mitts, baseball mitts, softball batting gloves, baseball batting gloves, grip tape for bats for softball and baseball; lacrosse balls, lacrosse sticks, lacrosse netting, protective safety padding for lacrosse; tennis balls, table tennis balls, tennis rackets, table tennis rackets, tennis nets, table tennis nets and tables for tennis and table tennis; hockey sticks, hockey pucks, protective safety padding for hockey, hockey gloves; boxing gloves, punching bags; protective gear for boxing, namely, head pads, mouth guards, punch mitts, body shields, body protector pads, protective handwraps, grip tapes for boxing; athletic tapes; racquet balls, racquet ball racquets, sports gloves for racquet ball; polo balls, polo mallets, protective gear for polo, namely, polo vest guards, polo goal posts; cricket balls, cricket bats, cricket batting gloves, protective padding for cricket, namely, cricket leg guards, cricket batting stumps; badminton racquets, badminton shuttlecocks, badminton nets, badminton racket grips, racket badminton string; soccer balls; and basketballs | ACTIVE | Dec 18, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Urban City Talent Designs Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Urban City Talent Designs Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Urban City Talent Designs Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TURNER, RICHARD R.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named SWING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2024 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 24, 2024 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2024 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 6, 2023 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 9, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Nov 9, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 15, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 15, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 1, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 14, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 14, 2008 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| May 14, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |