Drawing for MISSIONS FEST

USPTO serial 78631248

MISSIONS FEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCMORROW, RONALD G
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MISSIONS FEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Roberta Horton

ROBERTA HORTON IP DOCKETINGARNOLD & PORTER LLP555 12TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Educational conferences, seminars and workshops all in the field of religion; conducting seminars for church leaders in the field of religion; conducting youth rallies in the field of religionACTIVEFeb 12, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 7, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 7, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 23, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
May 23, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
May 23, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 14, 2007GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 25, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 25, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 25, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 25, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance