Drawing for CONVERGED RECORDING SOLUTIONS FOR VOICE AND DATA

USPTO serial 78631459

CONVERGED RECORDING SOLUTIONS FOR VOICE AND DATA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, DAHLIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONVERGED RECORDING SOLUTIONS FOR VOICE AND DATA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for capturing and recording voice and data in electronic multimedia communications and interactions, and computer hardware for use in connection therewith; software for the identification, automation, reporting, and evaluation of data generated by computer telephony systems, and computer hardware for use in connection therewith; software and hardware for telecommunications systems, namely, computer desktop and server based platforms integrating telephony hardware and computer software for display, control, and measurement of data, audio, and video for telecommunications; computer software and hardware for collection, identification, measurement, and reporting of quality and productivity data; computer hardware for communications management; communications management software for use in logging, storing, retrieving, analyzing, and reporting audio, video and data communications; telecommunications and data networking software and hardware for transporting and aggregating voice, data, and video communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; and computer telephony software and hardwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 20, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 15, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 16, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 15, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 14, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 14, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance