USPTO serial 78631472
PHIL-EZE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3232479Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2007
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PHIL-EZE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jordan A. LaVine
Jordan LaVine Flaster Greenberg PC1628 JFK Blvd15th FlPhiladelphia, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | fresh and frozen meats and processed meat products, namely, ham, turkey, lamb, beef steak, veal, chicken and pork sold only in bulk at wholesale to the food services industry and not relating to sports or a sports team | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2007 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2007 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |