USPTO serial 78631787
CHILDGUARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHILDGUARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas H. Pauley
DOUGLAS H PAULEY PAULEY PETERSEN & ERICKSON2800 W HIGGINS RD STE 365HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60195UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Legal services, including attorney services, related to: client counseling; developing screening policies for interviewing, hiring and interfacing with employees, contractors and volunteers that work with one or more specific groups of people, such as children; establishing guidelines, practices and procedures for managing and supervising staff and volunteers working with each group of people, to prevent or correct abuse or other unacceptable managerial or supervision behavior; establishing reporting procedures and documentation policies for identifying and recording each abuse or other unacceptable managerial or supervision behavior; structuring a responsive action plan to correct each abuse or other unacceptable supervision behavior; developing a written manual or other document in hard copy or electronic format; training employees, contractors and volunteers to implement a developed plan or program; and goods associated with the services, including manuals, programs and procedures in hard copy and electronic format | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |