USPTO serial 78631988
INHOUSEIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILLER, DAVID S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INHOUSEIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Mark Holland
J MARK HOLLAND J MARK HOLLAND & ASSOCIATES3 SAN JOAQUIN PLZ STE 210NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Consulting on the selection and integration of business telephone systems and service, and in the selection of local and long distance telephone carriers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer consultation services, namely, hosting, and mirroring the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; updating of computer software for others; technical consulting and research in the field of high-speed information access via computer network; designing and planning of computer systems and network infrastructure in the field of information technology for information technology users; remote monitoring of computer systems infrastructure; technical consultation in the field of computers for information technology and information technology users in the nature of providing information problem solving, advice, guidance, and configuration assistance, whether at the users' location or by telephone, via a global computer network, and by other electronic means; monitoring of computer systems and networks for others; providing backup computer programs and disaster recovery facilities and monitoring, maintenance and management of those computer programs and disaster recovery facilities; technical support, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, monitoring, maintenance and management of network systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 12, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 21, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |