USPTO serial 78632451
BNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Thomashower
William J. Thomashower Schwartz & Thomashower LLP15 Maiden Lane, Suite 705New York, NY 10038UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Food services, namely, vending in the field of foods and beverages, vending machine services and ordering services in the field of restaurant take-out | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Restaurant services; food services, namely, catering of foods and beverages, contract food services, cafeterias and canteen services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named BNY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |